Thursday, June 23, 2011

short hairstyles for women 2011

images short hair styles for women short hairstyles for women 2011. short hair styles 2011 for
  • short hair styles 2011 for


  • sriswam
    09-11 03:17 PM
    Just put in my humble $100 contribution for the rally.

    You guys have a good thing going. I just the love the selfless spirit and patience in this group. All the very best.

    -Sriswam




    wallpaper short hair styles 2011 for short hairstyles for women 2011. short hair cuts for women over
  • short hair cuts for women over


  • jonty_11
    07-06 01:18 PM
    Forgot in a hurry, it is updated now
    no problem buddy, I just dont want u getting caught plagializing....just kidding!

    Hope for thebest..I am hoping rumors abt accepting all July applications turn out true




    short hairstyles for women 2011. short haircuts 2011 for older
  • short haircuts 2011 for older


  • austingc
    04-28 01:56 PM
    its generally the case, where these loan officers doesn't understand the Immigration process.

    I also had to go thru it. I would suggest to give them a copy of I-140 approval. that is an approved doc, than a pending I-485.

    Good part is, the Underwriters generally know about the immigration process and would take 1-140 approval doc as a valid doc.

    Dont worry, your loan will be approved.
    Dont worry. I mortgaged through BOA and everything went well with my AOS and I am closing next week.




    2011 short hair cuts for women over short hairstyles for women 2011. new short hairstyles for 2011
  • new short hairstyles for 2011


  • pcs
    07-05 10:57 AM
    We need to have sticky & web fax on this issue



    more...

    short hairstyles for women 2011. short hair cuts for women
  • short hair cuts for women


  • insbaby
    07-06 01:40 AM
    Most leaders are actually volunteers in IV. They have a regular full time job.

    What you are saying: "who can take a flight to Washington DC on Monday morning, change the law by noon to issue GC to every EB category, have a lunch at Olive Garden, come back monday evening" :

    For this you need to hire full time lobbyist which costs a lot
    of money. IV budget is nowhere close to that the Hispanic lobby group:
    National council of La Raza whose budget is
    $40 million or $1.3 billion including its “affiliates” network.
    IV is a tiny organization in front of La Raza. Thats....a BILLION with full time lobbyist.

    I strongly suggest you listen to the audio interview to understand how big the hispanic
    lobby is.

    Raul Yzaguirre on Past and Future of La Raza : NPR (http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4229605)

    With such power also they cant pass CIR. But at least they ensure that no
    EB or illegal immigration reform will pass unless there is something for illegals.

    I agree. Thats what I tried to say.




    short hairstyles for women 2011. short hair styles 2011 for
  • short hair styles 2011 for


  • gc_waiter56
    07-06 10:59 AM
    All,

    Pls mention Zoe Lofgren's letter to DHS and DOS and also NY time article while talking/ meeting your lawmakers. Guys,pls dot it and it is worth giving it a try. We will not loose more than what we have lost by this fiasco.



    more...

    short hairstyles for women 2011. short hair styles 2011 for
  • short hair styles 2011 for


  • gc28262
    08-12 11:40 AM
    He has already been able to pass the law. Now whether he calls them chopshop or backtracks, or praises them.......it does not do anything. This will soon be a law.

    By the very nature of this senator, he didn't even have to rephrase it. If he did that, there is a reason for it.




    2010 short haircuts 2011 for older short hairstyles for women 2011. short hair styles for women
  • short hair styles for women


  • pani_6
    08-04 07:19 PM
    I was talking with my American Collegue about this Visa numbers and he heard this & decided to write a letter.I have toned down the harsh language ...but you can consider sending this out also..:)
    ;)



    more...

    short hairstyles for women 2011. makeup Long Hairstyles 2011
  • makeup Long Hairstyles 2011


  • harivenkat
    08-13 08:56 AM
    "08/12/2010: Wow, That Is Fast. H.R. 6080 Presented to President Today, and President to Sign 08/13/2010, Friday

    * As soon as the Senate passed the bill, the Congress quickly cleared for White House and has already been presented to the President. Since it passed during the special session, everything had to be cleared out of the Congress quickly, I guess. USCIS must be busy to get ready for processing and collecting increased fees from these employers soon. The new filing fees will be a huge amount, especially when they decide to file a premium processing request. Can you imagine how much these employers will lose for a single case if the case is filed on premium and denied!! Ouch!
    * The new fees will take effect tomorrow since the President is scheduled to sign it into law at 11:00 a.m. EST, tomorrow. "

    - The OH Law

    wondering if its time to leave....




    hair new short hairstyles for 2011 short hairstyles for women 2011. short hair styles 2011 for
  • short hair styles 2011 for


  • GCKarma
    07-06 11:12 AM
    Man, in frustration people do not even know what to say and what not! Be very careful of what you spin and what you say. From the looks of it, this stuff has every chance of spinning out of control and it may have already started the ball rolling.Think about it for a second!. Once it goes that way, trust me, we will all live to regret that.
    Yes, DHS approved upwards of 25000 GCs over the weekend, leading up to July 2nd. And some people are pissed off at that, err..why?
    Remember, those 25000 are one of us. Once,they too were in line for Labor certifications, I-140s, medical exams and all that crap. And some of them were in the so called "FBI Name check" black-hole for an extended period of time. We should be rejoicing in the fact that most of those backlogs got cleaned up. Instead we have people questioning the validity of those newly approved GCs.My dear friends, god willing, we will all have GCs one day and tell me, how would you feel if someone else comes screaming at you just because he did not get one too.
    Putting a "security lapse" spin on this could be very dangerous and should be avoided at any cost. I hope one of those anti-immigrant lobbies do not pick it up and start running with that. I prey that they do not revoke those already approved GCs, because if they do, then those poor 25000 souls will go through much more agony than what we are going through now.

    It's very tough to get the genie back in the bottle once it is out, so think before you start popping that cork.
    ~AMK

    Atleast those 25,000 people have EAD.Think about the remaining 700 thousand people who are in a deep shit



    more...

    short hairstyles for women 2011. short hair styles 2011 for
  • short hair styles 2011 for


  • bigboy007
    05-13 11:29 PM
    Did you ever apply for EAD / AP?

    My I-140 was never denied. In fact the date 09/04/2007 that NSC mentions about the denial is the date that I got approval notice. I have the approval copy from USCIS. I am not sure what the adjudicating officer is looking on his terminal.




    hot short hair cuts for women short hairstyles for women 2011. short hair styles for women
  • short hair styles for women


  • sanjeev_2004
    04-18 03:29 AM
    My I140 is pending since 16 May 2007. My employer is not helping much. Employer is not giving his attorney contact number also. After calling millions of times they putted one service request 4 months back but nothing happend. I talked to few attonrnies they told they can only work if your employer signs G28 form for me. But my employer is not even picking my phone. Can I do any thing without my Employer's help?



    more...

    house Short hairstyles for women short hairstyles for women 2011. apr short hairstyles asian
  • apr short hairstyles asian


  • nixstor
    07-06 10:53 AM
    we are not talking anything new nixstor, there are people already waiting for years to get name check done......dont think if you pretend like nothing is happened will get a GC within a year....even though we might still stuck for years in the name of name check


    May be you are right. I am pretending like nothing has happened. But Those folks who are adding spin to the issue on security checks, are you focusing in any way on the root cause of the problem. My point is, If you bring security on, every thing else is shelved until security is fixed. If its already there, let it be there. Let AILA figure out in the law suit how they approved. Let Rep Lofgren do it. Why should we stir up the hornet's nest on digg and open doors to anti guys to tighten security checks on us. Its like we are going out there and saying that "yes, My buddy got GC in 6 months. The security system is not working. Please fix it " What will be the result?




    tattoo short hair styles 2011 for short hairstyles for women 2011. hairstyles 2011 women short.
  • hairstyles 2011 women short.


  • saimrathi
    07-06 11:33 AM
    Agreed, that would be the biggest impact... But, not all of us would be able to get an opportunity elsewhere in the world.. For example, doctors, scientists... not many countries match US infrastructure..

    This is only my view...

    As the saying goes..."Justice delayed is Justice Denied"

    Considering our opportunity cost, many of us may be better off packing our bags and heading back - this may have an impact on the feds, the companies and people at large who think that WE are a burden on the society. All these artificial barriers and hurdles are a reflection of this.
    Its quite apparent that there is no end game in sight, there is no motive here(ref to subash and gandhi message by asharda), no end game...it can only get worse. The Feds have succeed in Scr....wing US.

    bottom line - Do we really add value to the society here?
    convince the people and this will be the ONLY solution to our problems.



    more...

    pictures short hair styles 2011 for short hairstyles for women 2011. latest short hairstyles for
  • latest short hairstyles for


  • sam2006
    07-19 12:53 AM
    thank you :)


    Signed up mothly contribution from july.

    Atleast with the current visa bullettin change has eased the worry of a lot of people if not all. Also get the satisfaction that we are doing something to improve our situation.




    dresses short hair styles for women short hairstyles for women 2011. very short haircuts for women
  • very short haircuts for women


  • john2255
    07-21 07:42 AM
    What you should do.

    If anyone lives in these Senators' jurisdictions, please call their offices and thank them for sponsoring the amendment, and encourage them to keep pushing for this amendment.

    SPONSOR: Senate Amendment 2339 Sen Cornyn, John [TX],

    COSPONSORS(6):

    Sen Enzi, Michael B. [WY]
    Sen Gregg, Judd [NH]
    Sen Smith, Gordon H. [OR]
    Sen Sununu, John E. [NH]
    Sen Coleman, Norm [MN]
    Sen Voinovich, George V. [OH]

    If anyone lives in Senators' jurisdictions who voted yes, please call their offices and thank them for understanding our problems and encourage them to keep pushing for this amendment.

    If you live in the jurisdiction of those who voted against the amendment, please call them and encourage them of the urgent need for similar amendments. Telephone is the best way to make your voice heard. Here is the link to the Senators' phone numbers and contact info.

    http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm

    See comments for the roll call of votes (the YEAS were the people who helped us, the NAYS were the people who hurt us).

    http://senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&session=1&vote=00266

    Grouped by Home State

    Alabama: (R-AL), Nay Shelby (R-AL), Yea
    Alaska: Murkowski (R-AK), Yea Stevens (R-AK), Yea
    Arizona: Kyl (R-AZ), Yea McCain (R-AZ), Yea
    Arkansas: Lincoln (D-AR), Nay Pryor (D-AR), Nay
    California: Boxer (D-CA), Nay Feinstein (D-CA), Nay
    Colorado: Allard (R-CO), Yea Salazar (D-CO), Nay
    Connecticut: Dodd (D-CT), Nay Lieberman (ID-CT), Yea
    Delaware: Biden (D-DE), Nay Carper (D-DE), Nay
    Florida: Martinez (R-FL), Yea Nelson (D-FL), Nay
    Georgia: Chambliss (R-GA), Yea Isakson (R-GA), Yea
    Hawaii: Akaka (D-HI), Nay Inouye (D-HI), Nay
    Idaho: Craig (R-ID), Yea Crapo (R-ID), Yea
    Illinois: Durbin (D-IL), Nay Obama (D-IL), Not Voting
    Indiana: Bayh (D-IN), Yea Lugar (R-IN), Yea
    Iowa: Grassley (R-IA), Yea Harkin (D-IA), Nay
    Kansas: Brownback (R-KS), Not Voting Roberts (R-KS), Yea
    Kentucky: Bunning (R-KY), Yea McConnell (R-KY), Yea
    Louisiana: Landrieu (D-LA), Yea Vitter (R-LA), Yea
    Maine: Collins (R-ME), Yea Snowe (R-ME), Yea
    Maryland: Cardin (D-MD), Nay Mikulski (D-MD), Nay
    Massachusetts: Kennedy (D-MA), Nay Kerry (D-MA), Nay
    Michigan: Levin (D-MI), Nay Stabenow (D-MI), Nay
    Minnesota: Coleman (R-MN), Yea Klobuchar (D-MN), Yea
    Mississippi: Cochran (R-MS), Yea Lott (R-MS), Not Voting
    Missouri: Bond (R-MO), Yea McCaskill (D-MO), Nay
    Montana: Baucus (D-MT), Yea Tester (D-MT), Nay
    Nebraska: Hagel (R-NE), Yea Nelson (D-NE), Yea
    Nevada: Ensign (R-NV), Yea Reid (D-NV), Nay
    New Hampshire: Gregg (R-NH), Yea Sununu (R-NH), Yea
    New Jersey: Lautenberg (D-NJ), Nay Menendez (D-NJ), Nay
    New Mexico: Bingaman (D-NM), Nay Domenici (R-NM), Yea
    New York: Clinton (D-NY), Nay Schumer (D-NY), Yea
    North Carolina: Burr (R-NC), Yea Dole (R-NC), Yea
    North Dakota: Conrad (D-ND), Nay Dorgan (D-ND), Nay
    Ohio: Brown (D-OH), Nay Voinovich (R-OH), Nay
    Oklahoma: Coburn (R-OK), Yea Inhofe (R-OK), Yea
    Oregon: Smith (R-OR), Yea Wyden (D-OR), Yea
    Pennsylvania: Casey (D-PA), Nay Specter (R-PA), Yea
    Rhode Island: Reed (D-RI), Nay Whitehouse (D-RI), Nay
    South Carolina: DeMint (R-SC), Yea Graham (R-SC), Yea
    South Dakota: Johnson (D-SD), Not Voting Thune (R-SD), Yea
    Tennessee: Alexander (R-TN), Yea Corker (R-TN), Yea
    Texas: Cornyn (R-TX), Yea Hutchison (R-TX), Yea
    Utah: Bennett (R-UT), Yea Hatch (R-UT), Yea
    Vermont: Leahy (D-VT), Nay Sanders (I-VT), Nay
    Virginia: Warner (R-VA), Yea Webb (D-VA), Nay
    Washington: Cantwell (D-WA), Yea Murray (D-WA), Yea
    West Virginia: Byrd (D-WV), Not Voting Rockefeller (D-WV), Nay
    Wisconsin: Feingold (D-WI), Nay Kohl (D-WI), Nay
    Wyoming: Barrasso (R-WY), Yea Enzi (R-WY), Yea



    more...

    makeup makeup Long Hairstyles 2011 short hairstyles for women 2011. Short hairstyles for women
  • Short hairstyles for women


  • chisinau
    07-27 03:44 AM
    There is an unconfirmed information from www.ucexchange.com about:

    S.AMDT.2448 Amends: H.R.2638 , S.AMDT.2383 Sponsor: Sen Schumer, Charles E. [NY] (submitted 7/25/2007) (proposed 7/25/2007)

    U.S. Senate Passes Bill that Might Provide "Recapture" of EB-3 Immigrant Visa Numbers that Went Unus
    By unanimous consent, the U.S. Senate passed a bill sponsored by Senators Schumer (D-NY), Hutchison (R-TX), and Kennedy (D-MA) that would "recapture" employment-based, third preference (EB-3) immigrant visa numbers that went unused because of processing delays during Fiscal Years 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2004. If this bill ultimately passes through Congress and becomes law as currently written, 50% of these "recaptured" numbers would be allocated to "Schedule A" occupations. Currently, the measure has passed through only the Senate. To become law, the bill would still have to pass through the House and be signed by President Bush.

    Does any one know wheather this is true???:confused: :confused:

    The official information is vice versa:
    http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:SP02448:
    7/26/2007:
    Proposed amendment SA 2448 withdrawn in Senate.

    Another BIG DISSAPOINTMENT!!!!!!! :::((((((((




    girlfriend hairstyles 2011 women short. short hairstyles for women 2011. short hair styles for women
  • short hair styles for women


  • chanduv23
    11-25 04:09 PM
    A general question - Is it normal to see LUDs on the 485, approved 140, approved 765/131 a few (3) weeks after sending AC21/G28N documentation in?

    I changed employers about a month ago (140 approved, 485 pending more than 180 days), and the new company filed AC21 on Nov 3. I saw a soft LUD on my 765, 131, 485, 140 yesterday (Nov 24) and another soft LUD on just my 485 today (Nov 25). I wonder if these have to do with the AC21 and G-28N updates or if it is a sign of I-140 revocation and I should expect a 485 denial soon?

    Any response will be highly appreciated.

    Thanks,

    g 28 does produce soft LUds so it is normal. Now AC21 documentation - whether it reaches file or not we don't know.




    hairstyles short hair styles 2011 for short hairstyles for women 2011. Short+hairstyles+for+women
  • Short+hairstyles+for+women


  • villamonte6100
    03-31 01:43 PM
    "This organization is headed by most incompetant people who doesn't have any clue of Management, I guess they should go back to school..."

    Very big statement.

    There are problem with the USCIS that is affecting everyone in this forum but saying they are incompetent and don't have clue of management is a very big statement.



    In this era of IT, USCIS keeps crying about being bombarded suddenly with this application that applications. I wonder such a big agency doesn't have projections etc. When you Adjudicated millions of Green cards lin 2002-2003 than obviously you are going to get bombarded with Application for Citizenship in 2007 you weren't prepared for that ??? This organization is headed by most incompetant people who doesn't have any clue of Management, I guess they should go back to school...




    GCKaMaara
    02-23 12:53 PM
    people,

    i just returned from an infopass meeting... the guy i talked to said that they recently have a directive from the DHS/USCIS that they want to separate the legal stuff from the illegal stuff and hence they are planning to adjudicate a record number of EB apps in the next quarter or two... does anyone else concur? is this true or were my ears just ringing in that meeting?

    --shark

    Wonderful! How much I believe IO from USCIS is a different story :)




    vk_vkumar
    07-15 03:14 PM
    The following memo from DOS to CIS says it all:

    July 2, 2007

    TO : CIS Section 245 ADJUDICATIONS

    FROM : Immigrant Visa Control

    SUBJECT : Authorizations for Employment CASES

    Effective Monday July 2, 2007 there will be no further authorizations in response to requests for Employment-based preference cases. All numbers available to these categories under the FY-2007 annual numerical limitation have been made available. Employment preference numbers will once again be available to these chargeability areas beginning October 1, 2007, under the FY-2008 annual numerical limitation.

    The above action is a direct result of the sudden backlog reduction efforts of CIS offices during June and the first few days of July. During this short time period over 60,000 requests have been received and authorized. This is in comparison to the 66,425 CIS requests which were authorized during the first eight months of the fiscal year.

    Please be sure that this information is passed to all personnel involved in the process of obtaining visa authorizations from the Visa Office for Section 245 cases



    No comments:

    Post a Comment